Price Shopping in Consumer Directed Health Plans
We use health insurance claims for employees continuously enrolled from the years 2004 - 2006 at 18 large firms dispersed across the United States. We compare outcomes from three employers that switched all employees to a CDHP plan (“full replacement”) in 2005 to outcomes from 15 employers that only offered a traditional health plan. Full replacement to CDHP plans takes away employee plan choice, which eliminates selection bias.
We estimate difference-in-differences equations to measure the effect of CDHP enrollment on prices paid for 9 common outpatient services relative to traditional plan enrollees, while controlling for firm and time fixed effects. In addition, we estimate differences in the share of claims that come from low cost providers and the savings from price shopping relative to choosing prices at random.
Preliminary results show that for 8 out of 9 services analyzed, prices paid by CDHP and traditional plan enrollees did not differ significantly; CDHP enrollees paid slightly less for office visits, but the difference, although statistically significant, was negligible. Similarly, office visits was the only service where CDHP enrollment resulted in a significantly larger share of claims from low cost providers and greater savings from price shopping relative to traditional plans. We conclude that enrollment in CDHPs is not associated with greater price-shopping for most common outpatient procedures.