49
Parental Investments in Response to Early Life Health

Tuesday, June 12, 2018
Lullwater Ballroom - Garden Level (Emory Conference Center Hotel)

Presenter: Rakesh Banerjee

Co-Author: Farhan Majid


A large literature documents the effects of early life health shocks on long run outcomes including

education, health and earnings. However, the role of parents in reinforcing initial health inequities or

mitigating them is not well understood. Furthermore, most studies do not study investments over a life

course and look at a single dimension of response such as education or health and ignore nonhuman

capital transfers. We fill these gaps in the literature by studying parental responses over multiple stages of

the life course and for multiple dimensions, including nonhuman capital transfers.

We utilize the overlap of Ramadan fasting month with pregnancies for Muslims as a natural experiment for

studying parental responses to fetal under nutrition. Ramadan is a holy month in the Islamic calendar.

Practicing Muslims are required to observe a strict fast from sunrise to sunset for a month. Since about

seventy five percent of all pregnancies overlap with Ramadan, it is estimated more than 1.2 billion Muslims

were potentially exposed to their mother’s fasting in utero. Our work builds on some recent studies which

show the negative effects of Ramadan exposure in utero on birth weight, cognition and labor market

outcomes later in life.

We study Muslims in Indonesia, the largest Muslim majority country in the world. Nationally representative

data from the 2007 wave of the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS 4) is used to study parental investment

response on human capital with detailed expenditures on health and education and on nonhuman

capital transfers (e.g. dowries) over a life cycle. Results show that for children younger than five years, parents are

less likely to get their exposed (during Ramadan in utero) children vaccinated and invest less in their diet.

However, we find an opposite pattern for older children, with parents investing more in vitamins or

supplements but we do not find any differences between exposed and nonexposed

children on educational investments. However, our results show that compared to unexposed children, mothers of exposed children

have lower expectations about future educational attainment of their children. In contrast to most papers in

the larger literature, we also look at nonhuman capital responses to fetal health shocks and find gender

differences in parental response. Females get fewer dowries and bring fewer assets into marriage, an

important marker for future bargaining power. For male adults, however, parents are more likely to provide

monetary and nonmonetary help attempting to mitigate inequities. We do not find any differential

responses on prenatal care. Overall our results suggests, parents make complimentary investments in

response to initial health endowments particularly for children younger than five years and mostly in the

form of investing in their children’s health care but also in terms of dowries for their daughters. These

results have important policy implications: if its not feasible to nudge pregnant women from unhealthy

cultural practises during pregnancy, one can instead focus on health care and physical capital transfers

early and later in life which may help mitigate the initial health inequities.